Ban The Kirpan 

The video transcript from The E Squared Show titled "Basics of Sikh Dating" reveals a series of foundational historical inaccuracies regarding the pre-colonial Indian sub-continent, medieval warfare codes, and regional demographics.

By cross-referencing his specific claims with established academic consensus, several major errors can be definitively identified.

• The Video's Narrative: The speaker states that ancient Indic/Vedic civilisations possessed high levels of military morality (refusing to enslave women or children) (6:06 ), but claims that "the Hindus had lost it long ago" (8:02 ), leaving the Sikh Khalsa as the sole heirs to righteous warfare (Dharam Yudh ) (6:52 ).
• The Historical Error: This claims a theological monopoly on righteousness that ignores the massive historical record of Hindu empires maintaining strict martial codes (Dharma Shastras ) throughout the medieval and early modern periods.
• The Counter-Proof: Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (1630–1680), the founder of the Maratha Empire, strictly enforced the Aajna Patra / Adnyapatra (royal code of conduct). When Maratha forces captured the daughter-in-law of the Muslim Governor of Kalyan (Mullah Ahmed), Shivaji famously reprimanded his officers, treated her with the highest dignity as a mother figure, and escorted her safely back to her family. Shivaji’s code explicitly forbade the molestation, enslavement, or forced conversion of captive women and children, proving that Dharma in warfare was fully alive in Hindu states independent of the Sikh movement.

 



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnyapatra Hindu Royal Code of Conduct

[2]https://ia801405.us.archive.org/34/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.99318/2015.99318.Shivaji-And-His-Times_text.pdf

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabhasad_Bakhar Sabhasad Bakhar 1697

[4] https://archive.org/details/BusatinusSalatineBijapur2 Basatin-us-Salatin

 

The Maratha invasion of his governorship in Kalyan (occurring between 1648 and 1657 depending on the regional timeline used by historians) is corroborated by several contemporary external records: Basatin-us-Salatin (Persian Court History of Bijapur): Written by Ibrahim Zubairi using direct Adil Shahi state farmans (decrees) and correspondences. It records Mulla Ahmad Navayat as the governor of the Kalyan jagir (fiefdom). It notes that Mulla Ahmad spent most of his time away at the capital city of Bijapur, leaving his family and deputy to handle local administration. This administrative absence directly allowed Shivaji’s general, Abaji Sondev, to stage a surprise raid and conquer the Kalyan-Bhiwandi zone. Mughal State Records & Chronicals: Later official Persian reports from the Deccan wars track Mulla Ahmad's political career. Following the loss of Kalyan and growing tensions in Bijapur, Mulla Ahmad actually defected to the Mughal Empire, seeking an alliance with the Mughals before his eventual death.


 

• The Video's Narrative: The speaker heavily relies on a localized "Indic/Vedic" separation to imply that the Punjab region was detached from wider Hindu history.
• The Historical Error: Geographically and historically, Punjab is the literal birthplace of what evolved into mainstream Hinduism.
• The Counter-Proof: The Rig Veda —the oldest scripture of Hinduism—was composed precisely in the Punjab region (historically known as Sapta Sindhu or the Land of Seven Rivers). Furthermore, major ancient Hindu universities like Takshashila (Taxila)  were located in greater Punjab. The region was ruled by ancient Hindu dynasties (like the Mauryas and Guptas) and medieval Hindu rulers (like the Hindu Shahi dynasty of Kabul and Punjab) for centuries before the arrival of Islamic invasions or the birth of Sikhism in 1469. To claim Punjab was "never Hindu" is a complete fabrication that denies the region's geographical centrality to ancient Indian philosophy.

• The Video's Narrative: The speaker romanticizes the martial heritage of Punjab, framing it as an unyielding line of "righteous soldiers" (Sant-Sipahi ) (7:16 ).
• The Historical Error: He completely overlooks the calculated social engineering of the British Empire's Martial Races Theory.
• The Counter-Proof: After the 1857 Indian Rebellion, the British systematically dismantled recruitment from regions that rebelled and targeted Punjabis (Sikhs, Punjabi Muslims, and Dogras) and Gurkhas because they remained loyal (ass lickers) to the British Crown during the mutiny. This was not a continuation of an ancient, independent spiritual mantle; it was a collaborative colonial mechanism where Sikh soldiers enlisted for financial salaries, land grants, and imperial benefits (1:07 ).

• The Video's Narrative: The speaker attempts to argue that the Khalsa must develop a "dharmic/theological version of dating" (12:56 ) and claims that modern restrictions on premarital interactions are just "made-up culture" rather than religious principles (1:12:39 ).
• The Historical Error: He looks at medieval texts through a highly anachronistic, 21st-century Western lens.
• The Counter-Proof: The Sikh Rehat Maryada (Code of Conduct) and historical Rehatnamas are explicitly clear on the prohibition of Par-Driat (adultery and sexual relationships outside of marriage). In the 15th to 18th centuries, dating as a casual psychological market did not exist in any Eastern tradition (1:12:43 ). Relationships were structurally funneled through formal courtship or family alliances. Pretending that the Gurus implicitly endorsed a pragmatic dating roster as long as there is honesty is a total modern retcon designed to soothe the cognitive dissonance of diaspora youth (40:29 ).

The video speaker’s attempt to normalize a "dating roster" and premarital relations completely shatters when placed next to the actual text of the Guru Granth Sahib (GGS).

In order to make Sikhism appeal to a modern, secular audience, internet personalities frequently hide the fact that the Sikh scripture contains deeply patriarchal medieval verses that aggressively mock, shame, and degrade women who express independent lust or sexual desire.

The metaphor of the "Unvirtuous Bride" (Kusulakhi or Dohagan ) , where a woman's natural sexual urges are weaponized as a symbol of spiritual corruption.

 

Here are the literal, unfiltered scriptural facts and verses that cause internet apologists to panic:

The Sikh scripture does not view female sexual autonomy as a healthy human expression. Instead, it uses graphic, derogatory language to frame a woman seeking physical pleasure outside her master/husband as a wretched, diseased entity:

• The Metaphor of the Prostitute:

  "There is one bed for the soul-bride, and the same bed for God, her Lord and Master. The self-willed manmukh does not obtain the Mansion of the Lord's Presence; she wanders around, in limbo.
  Uttering, "Guru, Guru", she seeks His Sanctuary; so God comes to meet her, without a moment's delay. 
  One may perform many rituals, but the mind is filled with hypocrisy, evil deeds and greed.
  When a son is born in the house of a prostitute, who can tell the name of his father? 
  Because of devotional worship in my past incarnations, I have been born into this life. The Guru has inspired me to worship the Lord, Har, Har, Har, Har." - Ang 837

• The Filthy Bride Verse:

  "She may wear good clothes, but the bride is ugly and rude; her mind is false and impure.
  She does not walk in harmony with the Will of her Husband Lord. Instead, she foolishly gives Him orders.
  But she who walks in harmony with the Guru's Will, shall be spared all pain and suffering.
  That destiny which was pre-ordained by the Creator cannot be erased.
  She must dedicate her mind and body to her Husband Lord, and enshrine love for the Word of the Shabad.
  Without His Name, no one has found Him; see this and reflect upon it in your heart.
  O Nanak, she is beautiful and graceful; the Creator Lord ravishes and enjoys her." - Ang 89  

  https://www.sikhitothemax.org/ang?source=G&ang=89

If you take a physical woman—even a world-famous supermodel—who actively rejects the Divine Name/God (Naam ), Gurbani’s verdict is absolute: her external physical perfection is completely irrelevant. Spiritually and characteristically, she is considered ugly, filthy, and ungraceful .

 

Crushing Failed  Sikh Logic

 

The Bhagavad Gita: The Path of Selfless, Detached Action

 

Failed Sikh Gurbani: The Premise of Radical Dependence

This verse explicitly covers anyone—including self-willed individuals (Manmukhs/atheists ), people exercising their own free will, those who ignore the Naam , and specifically those who commit adultery (even GurSikhs). 

In the original text, the words translated as "corrupt pleasures" are ਬਿਖੈ ਰਸ (Bikhai Ras ), which literally translates to "poisonous tastes" or "toxic pleasures." In Gurbani, the ultimate poisonous taste is Kaam (blind lust or unbridled sexual desire).

Gurbani directly identifies adultery (desiring or sleeping with someone else's spouse) as a primary example of this toxic poison. For instance, on Ang 403, Guru Arjan writes:

 

Therefore, when Ang 252: says people are entangled in these pleasures, it is directly pointing at those who abandon moral laws and spiritual discipline to engage in illicit affairs or adultery.

The verse continues on Ang 252 :

• The Free Will trap: Ahambudhi means relying entirely on your own human intellect, ego, and independent will while ignoring the universal spiritual law. Anyone who says, "I have the free will to sleep with whoever I want and chase my own pleasures," falls directly into this category. Gurbani states that this self-willed mind is drunk on illusion.
• The Godly hypocrites: This verse explicitly includes people who claim to be religious or godly but secretly disobey the Naam . A few lines later on the exact same page, the Sikh Guru writes: "When there is no love for the Naam, then these [religious] rituals are corrupt." You can put on a holy show, but if you secretly indulge in toxic vices like adultery, your outer "godliness" is deemed a fraud.

The verse outlines the direct spiritual punishment for prioritizing these physical lusts over the Naam :

 

By choosing to be a slave to physical impulses (like adultery) and your own ego, you bind your soul to the material universe. Instead of breaking free and merging back into the Creator, the soul is forced back into the painful, repeating cycle of reincarnation.

 

Guru Ram Das (the 4th Sikh Guru) Ang 304 wrote:

"Over the head of the manmukh is the order of the woman; to her, he ever holds out his promises of goodness.
Those men who act according to the orders of women are impure, filthy and foolish.
Those impure men are engrossed in sexual desire; they consult their women and walk accordingly.
One who walks as the True Guru tells him to, is the true man, the best of the best.
He Himself created all women and men; the Lord Himself plays every play."

 

The Sikh Guru on Ang 304 is explicitly defining a form of moral and psychological slavery to lust. The verse describes a man who has become completely mindless, disoriented, and has compromised his own decision-making faculties because he is entirely consumed by physical attraction and infatuation. However, if a text says a man lost control because he listened to a woman, it naturally implies that the woman acted as a seductive temptress.

 

Leap frog to Ang 403, Guru Arjan writes: 

"The sweet flavors tempt you, and you are occupied by your false and filthy business. 
Your senses are beguiled by sensual pleasures of sex, by anger, greed and emotional attachment.
The All-powerful Architect of Destiny has ordained that you shall be reincarnated over and over again."

"For a moment of sexual pleasure, you shall suffer in pain for millions of days.
For an instant, you may savor pleasure, but afterwards, you shall regret it, again and again. ||1||
O blind man, meditate on the Lord, the Lord, your King."

 

By the definitions of both the verses (Ang 252 & Ang 403) and Sikh law, premarital sex, cohabitation, and adultery are entirely prohibited in Sikhism. Anyone who engages in these acts is considered to be acting out of Kaam (lust) and living as a Manmukh (self-willed egoist!)

While the video speaker claims that "women are horny as fuck" and that navigating sex through a "dating roster" can be done in a "dharmic" way (21:18 ), the GGS explicitly defines casual sexual attraction (Kaam ) as a toxic poison that destroys a human being's worth:

• The Smearing of Desire:

  "O sexual desire, you lead the mortals to hell; you make them wander in reincarnation through countless species." (Ang 1358)

When the video speaker tries to invent a middle ground where casual physical interactions are fine as long as there are "no lies" (20:54 ), he is caught in a massive loop of historical and textual denial:

1. The Scriptural Reality: The GGS explicitly demands total mental and physical fidelity modeled on the medieval, submissive wife who exists solely to please her master. Sex is strictly authorized within the Anand Karaj (marriage) purely for societal stability and procreation.
2. The " ऑपरेटिंग सिस्टम" (Operating System) Patch: Because modern young Sikhs in the diaspora are living in a secular dating culture, internet apologists realize they are losing the next generation. If they tell the youth the raw truth—that the holy book compares casual dating and sexual exploration to a "barking dog" or a "prostitute"—the youth will instantly walk away (33:40 ).
3. The Hypocritical Retcon: Therefore, they invent a completely fake, sanitized version of history where they pretend the Gurus were "sex-positive" or open to modern social dynamics (14:29 ). They use modern English words to mask the raw, patriarchal shaming embedded in the original Gurmukhi.

Mainstream Sikh websites claim that the faith completely revolutionized women's rights and liberated human expression. Yet, the moment a woman or a man exercises independent sexual autonomy outside their rigid institutional framework, the scripture shifts into a medieval polemic—branding the woman as an "ugly-faced, unvirtuous bride burning in filthy lust."

The speaker in the video is not teaching history; he is desperately trying to engineer a modern, secular PR patch to hide a deeply dogmatic scriptural reality.

The speaker is attempting to execute "Internet PR Retcon." He recognizes the massive disconnect and sexual misconduct happening secretly within the modern orthodox factions (Taksals and AKJ groups). 12:04

To save his path from looking obsolete, he invents a false history where Western religions "never had morals" (8:02 ), Hindus "lost their morals" (8:02 ), and only his specific ideological framework can handle human reality (8:10 ). By fact-checking his claims against real sovereign history, his narrative exposes itself as just another biased, unscientific marketing Sikh brochure.

 

Sikhs have lost their way!!